![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello everyone,
Changes are underway to General Skills Migration: "The government will dump 20,000 applications from would-be migrants in a crackdown on low-skilled entrants. In changes aimed at making skilled migration more responsive to Australia's needs, the government will tighten the list of target occupations and focus instead on healthcare, engineering and mining. All general skilled migration applications lodged before September 1, 2007 - when English and work experience requirements were easier - will have their applications withdrawn and application fees totalling $14 million refunded. The government will also abolish the current list of skills in demand, which contains 106 occupations, and review the points test used to assess migrants to improve selection. The current points system puts an overseas student with a short-term vocational qualification gained in Australia ahead of a Harvard-educated environmental scientist. The bar was being raised for applicants without an Australian employer prepared to sponsor them. There were many occupations where the supply of qualified young Australians was adequate. But there were some jobs where there was a high demand for skills such as for hospital nurses, country doctors and resource sector employees." http://www.smh.com.au/national/austr...0207-nkxh.html |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Immigration gets harder again. I wonder if the government wants an overall reduction in numbers, or if they just want to change who's coming here?
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
From the BBC:
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's all very confusing but my understanding that those who have already applied (after 01.09.07) will be assessed under the existing rules. On the plus side, the changes later this year could be good news for some.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the government unemployment levels are masked a little, with plenty of part-time work instead of a full 40 hour week for a lot of people. They will be trying to get people employed that have less skills and a need for a proper income. I think it is a good idea as the majority of students have youth on their side.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better skills matching is a good idea both for Australia and the migrants. It's also very diffucult to get professional employment if you have poor english skills.
"Dr Birrell and University of Melbourne migration expert Lesleyanne Hawthorne said too many overseas students were emerging from the nation's universities with little or no official improvement in their English." http://www.theaustralian.com.au/high...-1225828473695 |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not much different from the previous priorities as far as I can see. Looks like it’s going to be more worthwhile to get state sponsorship as you get pushed up into category 2 for this.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
From what I understand applicants are no longer allowed the 15 points from an occupation on the MODL list. This makes it much harder to get the sufficient number of points to qualify, although passing the IELTS test will give you an extra 10 points.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|